An Editorial Criticized A Chart Caption

An editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reducesan editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces thethe chance ofchance of plaqueplaque onon teethteeth by overby over nbsp 400 percent 400 percent.

An editorial criticized a chart caption. 47 94 an editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces thethe chance of plaque on teeth by over 400 percent what is wrong with this statement. Chose the correct answe below. A reduction of 100 would eliminate all plaque so it is not possible to reduce it by more than 100.

You can put this solution on your website. An editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental floss as one that reduces the chance of plaque on teeth by over 400 percent what is wrong with this statement. What is wrong with this statement.

Answer by jim thompson5910 35218 show source. Simply examine your image and describe what s going on. For newsworthy content to have any long term value it must include a proper editorial caption that identifies the important aspects of the image footage clip.

The statement should ve stated that the dental rinse could reduce plaque up to 100 instead. The problem with this statement is that the percentage exceeds 100. The easiest way to check your caption is to make sure it has the following qualifiers.

A new york times editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces plaque on teeth by over 300. Who what where and when. An editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces the chance of plaque on teeth by over 300 percent what is wrong with this statement.

A new york times editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces plaque on teeth by over 300 what is wrong with that statement.